Study after Velasquez's portrait of Pope Innocent X' is simply Bacon's own personal interpretation of Velasquez's original painting. In fact, Bacons interpretation took over 20 years of experimentation to complete. Perhaps this is why it has been so hard for scholars to come to a conclusion as to what Bacon's 'Study after Velasquez's portrait of Pope Innocent X' means. For some the screaming mouth (which is the most prominent feature of the papal depiction) suggests some kind of existential agony, perhaps revealing the 'pathos of human vulnerability and loss of faith and conviction' as quoted from this article.
I wanted the piece to begin with the stillness that is depicted in Velasquez's original portrait by recreating the ambiance of a cathedral (such as echoed footsteps fading away and the echoed murmur of prayer) combined with the Pope shuffling around in his chair such as wood creaking, light breathing and his robes making light noises as they shift with the moving body of the wearer. This is to set up for a change in pacing and to ultimately build up to the scream which is the climax of Bacons portrait. I want to make the second portion of the piece have more supernatural tones, with ghostly whispering and a rushing of wind. As the piece continues the rush of wind will become greater and the whispers will become louder. We will hear the Pope begin to tense up, clutching his chair, trying to resist the alluring yet conflicting things the 'whispers' are saying to him. As he resists the voices will become more persistent and grow more impatient. The wind will become stronger, forcing the Pope into the back of his seat.




















